Rumors regarding a potential spot Litecoin (LTC) Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) have sparked a significant price surge, with the digital asset gaining 10% amid speculation of institutional interest. Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett, through a post on X (formerly Twitter), unveiled insights suggesting growing institutional intrigue towards a Litecoin ETF.
Terrett shared, “SCOOP: Hearing rumblings on the institutional level about possible interest in a Litecoin ETF. The logic is that because of LTC functional similarities to BTC, the SEC may be more inclined to approve it, possibly even more so than ETH.”
Why A Spot Litecoin ETF Could Be Possible
This statement comes at a pivotal time as the crypto market continues to navigate through regulatory uncertainties and growing interest from traditional financial institutions. Adding to the buzz, Terrett highlighted recent actions by the Coinbase Derivatives to launch futures contracts for Dogecoin, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash, all set to begin on April 1st, 2024.
These futures contracts, as detailed, are part of Coinbase’s strategic move to diversify its offerings, leveraging the self-certification approach under CFTC Regulation 40.2(a). This approach permits entities to launch new products without the explicit approval of the CFTC, provided they comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and accompanying regulations.
Moreover, the recent classification of Ethereum (ETH) and Litecoin (LTC) as commodities by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in its lawsuit against KuCoin has added another layer of legitimacy to the discourse surrounding Litecoin’s regulatory standing. The CFTC’s action emphasizes its view of certain cryptocurrencies as commodities.
Amidst these regulatory clarifications and developments, discussions about the potential approval of a spot Litecoin ETF have intensified. Luke Martin, a renowned crypto analyst, echoed the sentiment, suggesting that the approval of an Ethereum ETF could pave the way for other “old altcoins,” like Litecoin, which may have a stronger case for not being classified as securities.
He stated, “When the ETH ETF launches and passes, the question then becomes especially with the SEC’s track record versus tokens […] there’s other dinosaur old altcoins which you can make almost a stronger case [that] they’re not a security, one that sounds ridiculous but if you think deeply about it, it’s true – Dogecoin you could probably prove easier is not a security than ETH. Why wouldn’t they launch Litecoin, Dogecoin?”
CFTC FILING: COINBASE FILES TO LIST FUTURES FOR $DOGE $LTC $BCH
Is this a hint for which alts are getting ETFs next?!
Spoke with @zhusu a few weeks ago about this exact scenario, and the unique trading opportunities that come with a $DOGE ETF. pic.twitter.com/tlyFgDvUhR
— Luke Martin (@VentureCoinist) March 21, 2024
Adding to the momentum, Alan Austin, Managing Director at the Litecoin Foundation, expressed enthusiasm about the prospects of a spot Litecoin ETF, stating, “I’ll say it again, love or hate ETFs, the first company to launch a Litecoin ETF is going to crush it!”
LTC Price Is Lagging Behind
Despite the current buzz, Litecoin’s price analysis indicates that it is still down by 77% from it’s all-time high in May 2021, signaling a bearish trend in comparison to other cryptocurrencies that have already surpassed their 2021 peaks. Nevertheless, a recent break above the 200-week EMA has ignited a glimmer of bullish momentum.
Overcoming the red resistance zone between $102 and $106 could be critical for Litecoin to reach new heights, with the $128 mark (0.236 Fibonacci retracement level) as a potential near-term target.
Featured image created with DALL·E, chart from TradingView.com
Disclaimer: The article is provided for educational purposes only. It does not represent the opinions of NewsBTC on whether to buy, sell or hold any investments and naturally investing carries risks. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use information provided on this website entirely at your own risk.
Comments (No)